Author Topic: The louderARTS Project Poetry Slam Policy, August 2008  (Read 552 times)

Sean

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
The louderARTS Project Poetry Slam Policy, August 2008
« on: August 28, 2008, 08:00:20 AM »
FYI. I just plucked this off of the LouderArtsPorject's Website. They are the team I was most impressed with this year at NPS. Their whole program interests me because though they come from a slam heavy background they choose to make it mandatory for their writers to utilize formalism and other (non-slam) avenues to make their artistic community stronger.

Just thought some of you might like to see this as well,

sean





The louderARTS Project Poetry Slam Policy, August 2008

The 2008 louderARTS National Poetry Slam team included Rachel McKibbens, Ove Salcedo, Marty McConnell and Jeanann Verlee. The team, the 10th team sent to the National Poetry Slam by The louderARTS Project, placed second in the nation. In those ten years, we made it to the finals six times, only once failed to at least make the semis, and eight times finished ranked in the top 10.

However, we are proudest that every year we send a team to the Nationals, we are credited with sending a collection of the most accomplished writers there, and with sending arguably some of the most accomplished writing teams in all of National Poetry Slam history.

Still, poetry slam is not the reason for which The louderARTS Project exists. It is one of the vehicles through which we hope to avail our constituents with groundbreaking, well written and highly performed poetry. So while we appreciate what the National Poetry Slam has given us and what we have given in return, we do not think our mission is best served by concentrating year in, year out on the Slam.

To this end, we will not be sending a team to the National Poetry Slam every year from here on in.

Beginning with the 2008-2009 slam season, we will send a team every other year. Therefore, next year, 2009, we will not be sending a team.  We will, however, still be running a slam season at Bar 13, and, as in previous years, we plan to run two slams a month, narrow the field to 15 semi-finalists by April, nine finalists for early May and produce a team of four through our final night of competition.

That team will be fellowshipped to summer writing programs. Our hope is that by giving four writers from our community the opportunity every other year to improve their knowledge and craft, that we will continuous improve the quality and artistic knowledge of our artist base.  This in turn will help us build a stronger base of writers who will compete (or not) and then go out into the larger artistic world (National Poetry Slam included) and have a more positive impact in those spheres.

How the slam season will work

As usual, there will be two slams a month. As in the past, the first eight people to sign up get to compete and there will be three rounds of poetry. After the first round, five are carried to the second and three are carried to the third. Poems must be under 3 minutes and 10 seconds and the third round poem cannot be repeated again in the slam until the semi-finals.

However, one of the slams every month will be specifically themed. These themes will be announced and posted on the web site (www.louderARTS.com) and available by e-mailing the curators at  curator@louderarts.com.  It might be a night of one-minute or less poems. It might be a night of villanelles and pantoum. It might be a night of slamming Aime Cesaire's poems or Sharon Olds' poems or the like. Suggestions for themes are always welcome.

To qualify for the semi-finals, one must have participated in at least three preliminary slams, at least ONE of which must have been a theme slam, which is to say, if you've done five slams and they're all only traditional/regulation slams, then you will NOT have qualified.  The semi-finals will comprise four rounds, one of which will be a “form” round and one of which will be a one or two minute round.  As in the past, points are gained towards the semi-finals by making it into the third round in preliminary bouts and coming in 1st (3 points), 2nd (2 points) or 3rd (1 point).

What summer writing programs qualify for the fellowship?

This is entirely up to you. There is a plethora of programs out there, from independent study retreats like Hedgebrook, to Cave Canem, to Breadloaf, to the 92nd Street Y.  We recommend that poets begin research immediately into programs, and apply for them at the earliest point their guidelines allow.  This means that if you are accepted, you know exactly what you're playing for as the slam season progresses. You're playing to have the costs of your summer education defrayed, or taken care of altogether, depending on what the dollar value of the finals prize turns out to be.

What if I am not accepted by any of my preferred summer programs, but make the “team?”

You can then design a course of study for the summer that will be fully or partially underwritten by your winnings.  It will have to be approved by the curators, but might involve personal instruction from a poet of your choosing, purchase and study of a selection of books.

What if I am accepted by one of my preferred summer programs, but DON'T make the team?

Then you have the chance to go learn anyway. But if you can't afford it, many of these retreats or workshops will allow you to defer acceptance for a year, and many offer scholarships.

What do I do with my new-found poetic knowledge?

Team members will:

    * feature at louderARTS: the reading series, as a group or individually
    * share learnings from the fellowship via a workshop (intensive or multi-week), or essay

We would also hope that you take your new shiny poems and bring them back to our slam for the next year in which we actually send a team to the National Poetry Slam.

Can I slam for the summer writing program prize and still compete for a team actually going to the National Poetry Slam?

Yes! You of course will have to figure out whether or not the summer writing program you might win will conflict with your rehearsal schedule for that team, but competing in the louderARTS finals and making our “team” on Fellowship years will not disqualify you from participating in another venue’s National Poetry Slam team.

Mondays @ 7:00 pm
13 Bar | Lounge
35 East 13th Street @ University Place
     2nd Floor
New York, NY 10003 • 212.979.6677
4, 5, 6, L, N, Q, R, W to 14th Street | Union Square
$6 | $5 students
2 for 1 drinks

ms_spelt

  • Community Member
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 380
    • View Profile
Re: The louderARTS Project Poetry Slam Policy, August 2008
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2008, 05:42:26 PM »
Now we are talking.
this is the type of thing i've been on about when i talk about talent development and sending people to slam camp.
and as rachel notes-it produces talented writers and performers-and it gets results as well in terms of the numbers at NPS-winning all round.
now we don't have the dollars of NY louder arts(at present) which is why i suggested sending the alternate to such a program.
we're already budgeting to send those people on a trip for which we cover most of the costs.
why not send our alternat to become a better writer and crack the top four?
keep doing that and eventually every one of our top four has been to such a program and are working hard to stay in the top four as the next wave of number 5s nip their heels-less expensive,same basic principle.
in fact it's within our basic current budget-give or take-with the minimum change in everything else.
i understand that in order to send 4 people to writing programs they have to bow out of nps every other year. we could continue to go every year as long as we sent our alternate to such a program.
while i get the point,i think no one going to nps every other year is a tough sell to folks.
sending our alternate recognizes budding potential and nurtures it.
and it lights a fire under our top four to maximize their learning experience at NPS so they can compete with a former alternate who has been away getting further development.
it discourages complaceny and resting on one's laurels and sets a clear priority on developing better poets and poetry.
for some time now i've felt like a lone voice int he wilderness on this issue-i heartily applaud sean for showing us all that such an approach does yield positive results.
i think we should all heed this example that we've been presented and examine where within our current  budgetary expectations we can fashion something that ,within our means, follows this example.
thanks again sean

"this is the law of the jungle-as old and as true as the sky.
every wolf that keeps it shall prosper-every wolf that does not must die
like the creeper the girdles the tree trunk,the law circles forward and back
the strength of the pack is the wolf and the strength of the wolf is the pack"